A extra highly effective Google Pixel 10 is not essential

I am uninterested in the identical arguments I see on a regular basis criticizing Pixel smartphones. I’ve heard them because the Pixel 6, they usually typically ignore Google’s historical past with smartphones. I do not know why it is so inconceivable to so many who Google selected to construct worth in its smartphones in a different way than different producers. Pixels aren’t about uncooked energy, they usually will not be anytime quickly.

With the Pixel 10, Google can solidify what the corporate labored so arduous for. After years of overheating Tensor chipsets and subpar shows, the Pixel 10 ought to be Google’s victory lap, marking a 3rd straight profitable launch with wonderful {hardware} and dependable software program. I would hate to see Google revert to its previous habits. You do not want a extra highly effective Pixel 10, you simply suppose you do.

I do not know what we’d like all this uncooked efficiency for

What cannot you do in your Pixel?

I’ve used Tensor chipsets on Google smartphones because the starting, beginning with the Pixel 6, and I’ve but to come across a significant process that I could not carry out on my Pixel as a result of it is underpowered — not one. I’ve used a number of flagship smartphones powered by Snapdragon 8 Elite chipsets. Certain, they’re spectacular, however my Pixel 9 Professional XL gives an Android expertise that’s simply as easy. I do not care about uncooked efficiency knowledge from a ineffective benchmark check. I belief what my eyes see, and the Tensor G4 delivers a flagship smartphone expertise that is well worth the worth of admission. I agree that the Pixel 10 wants higher gaming efficiency, however the Tensor G5 ought to deal with this, with a rumored 15% bump in GPU efficiency.

If the corporate have been to introduce a extra highly effective Tensor chipset, the price would improve, and most of us would by no means profit from the added uncooked efficiency.

The complaints additionally annoy me as a result of the identical people who find themselves upset that the Tensor chipsets aren’t extra highly effective are the identical individuals who did not purchase a Pixel 4. Google tried to compete spec for spec with different smartphone producers, loading the Pixel 4 sequence with a Snapdragon 855, nevertheless it did not work. Individuals weren’t taken with Pixels that would dangle with Galaxy telephones and others in a straight-line race; Google wanted to search out one other means.

The consumer expertise issues

Google provides worth in different methods

Even when you do not respect Google’s software program or consumer expertise, it stays a promoting level for a lot of. I really like Android 15 on my Pixel 9 Professional XL, and I am trying ahead to Materials 3 Expressive. Google wanted an up to date design language, and the corporate seems to have nailed it. Pixel software program extras, reminiscent of Now Enjoying, look like small additions, however I all the time miss them when testing smartphones from different producers. It is not that Google cannot put a extra highly effective chipset in its telephones. It merely acknowledges that there are different areas the place it may possibly compete.

I am not bought on the advantages of AI on my smartphone. Nonetheless, Google’s AI roadmap is essentially the most coherent of any producer. Google Gemini is much from excellent, however initiatives like Challenge Astra get me excited. Smartphones will not be about cameras and efficiency within the subsequent ten years. As an alternative, corporations should show how nicely their units combine into our lives. Samsung’s Galaxy AI is a multitude, with a load of ineffective options on my Galaxy S25 Extremely. It might not matter to you proper now, however Google is forward in AI, and there is financial worth to that.

Extra energy, however at what value?

I do not want efficiency I am not going to make use of

Google’s smartphones are costly sufficient. I do not wish to spend greater than what I needed to on my Pixel 9 Professional XL on a Pixel 10. If the corporate have been to introduce a extra highly effective Tensor chipset, the price would improve, and most of us would by no means profit from the added uncooked efficiency. I am not comfy paying for the ability I do not want in a smartphone, and if we’re trustworthy with ourselves, we do not want a Snapdragon 8 Elite on each machine to have a strong expertise.

Moreover, not each machine must enchantment to everybody. When you genuinely really feel strongly about having essentially the most highly effective benchmarking telephone in the marketplace, contemplate the Galaxy S25 Extremely or the OnePlus 13. I am glad that Google is doing one thing completely different. Competitors is crucial, and I would quite have Google step out by itself. I’ve watched the corporate attempt to go toe-to-toe with related spec sheets, and Pixels all the time felt like an also-ran. Google’s in an excellent place now; it simply has to remain the course.

Perspective is necessary with smartphones

I perceive that individuals are pissed off and don’t love the concept they are not getting essentially the most spectacular spec sheet doable on their $1,200 Pixel flagship smartphone, however a stability must be struck. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Extremely is priced at $1,300 and lags behind the innovation seen in its abroad counterparts. Moreover, Samsung does not supply 16GB of RAM, in contrast to Google. Smartphones might be much less about specs transferring ahead. It is about time we realized to search out worth somewhere else.