YouTube is the world’s largest and hottest video streaming service. Regardless of sharing the identical identify and branding as its video sibling, YouTube Music is not as fashionable, falling behind Spotify and Apple Music. Whereas YouTube Music stays my most well-liked alternative when listening on my telephone with my wi-fi earbuds, there are a number of options it might borrow from Apple Music and Spotify to ship a greater expertise.
Associated
I attempted Spotify and Apple Music, solely to appreciate YouTube Music is the higher alternative
I simply want the UI was higher
5
Higher podcast integration
Take a look at Spotify
Whereas it could not have been as polished as Pocket Casts, Google Podcasts was a stable solution to get pleasure from your favourite podcasts. Then, Google determined to kill Google Podcasts and combine podcasts into YouTube Music. Like nearly all the things that Google does, the expertise is half-baked.
On YouTube Music, Google solely exhibits content material marked as a podcast, which restricts the content material accessible on the platform. You possibly can add third-party podcasts through an RSS feed. Nevertheless, they do not assist all of the native podcast options that YouTube Music provides.
Should you’re a heavy podcast listener, you may get pleasure from Spotify’s expansive podcast library and unique exhibits.
Google has improved podcast assist in YouTube Music because the finish of Google Podcasts final yr, including many fundamental options. Nonetheless, there’s plenty of work left to do. Till that occurs, use one of many finest podcast apps for Android.
4
Hello-res music streaming
Nonetheless a lacking piece in YouTube Music’s arsenal
For a music streaming service that has been round for a very long time, YouTube Music lags behind its opponents in a number of areas, together with high-res audio streaming.
Even Spotify’s Hello-Fi music streaming tier is nowhere to be seen, regardless of the firm teasing it in February 2021. Nonetheless, that doesn’t give Google a free cross, particularly because it has deeper pockets than Spotify. Let’s not overlook that it additionally owns YouTube, which hosts the world’s largest video content material library.
Apple Music and Amazon Music have provided hi-res audio streaming for a couple of years. Google taking a couple of months to catch as much as its opponents would have been justified. Nevertheless, it will likely be almost 4 years since Apple’s announcement, and there may be nonetheless no signal of Google planning to supply something comparable.
Just like the competitors, Google raised its streaming costs within the final couple of years. It might have added hi-res streaming into the combo as a solution to at the very least justify the worth improve.
YouTube Music means that you can stream music at a most of 256kbps. That is lower than Spotify Premium’s 320kbps choice. Nevertheless, solely customers with high-end audio gear will discover the distinction in high quality. Nonetheless, this does not justify YouTube Music’s failure to enhance its audio high quality and sustain with the competitors.
3
A Spotify Join various
Present easy music management
Spotify Join is among the finest options of Spotify, and Google ought to copy it. The function means that you can management music playback from one other gadget. For example, for those who’re listening to Spotify in your pc or laptop computer, you should use your telephone as a distant to manage playback. This won’t sound spectacular, however once you get used to Spotify Join in every day life, there is no going again.
Provided that Google owns the Forged protocol and makes use of it to show your telephone right into a distant management for Forged-enabled Android and Google TVs, it could possibly provide the same integration for YouTube Music. Think about having the ability to seamlessly hand over music playback out of your telephone to your PC or vice versa.
YouTube Music’s present Forged integration tries to emulate Spotify Join, however the expertise is not nearly as good. The important thing cause is that Google Forged is suitable with a restricted set of units in comparison with Spotify Join.
2
Native desktop app
An internet app doesn’t reduce it
Supply: Jules Wang / AP
YouTube solely provides native YouTube Music apps for iOS and Android. That is it. There is no devoted Home windows or Mac app. As a substitute, YouTube needs you to make use of the net app, which is clunky and fails to supply an expertise akin to Spotify or Apple Music.
The dearth of a local YouTube Music app for PCs ruins the expertise, as the net app is gradual to load and use. It additionally turns into a difficulty when you might have separate accounts for YouTube Music and log in to Google with a unique account.
I depend on some third-party YouTube Music apps for Mac to work across the lack of a local app. Whereas it is probably not probably the most refined answer, it delivers a greater expertise than the net app. Plus, they arrive with enhancements, like plugins for Discord integration, picture-in-picture, ambient mode, and extra.
Even Apple, recognized for its walled ecosystem method, supplies a devoted Apple Music app for Android and Home windows, two of its competing platforms. There is no cause why YouTube Music can not accomplish that. As for Spotify’s desktop app, it provides an expertise that YouTube Music cannot match. Even its Android and iOS apps are superior to these of YouTube Music.
Whereas doing so, Google ought to look into bettering the YouTube Music app for Put on OS. It acts as a standalone app, reasonably than a companion to the primary app in your telephone. Spotify beats Google’s music streaming service, providing a greater Put on OS app.
Associated
6 methods to curate your Spotify Wrapped playlist for 2025
Curate a playlist you may be proud to share
1
Spotify Mix beats YouTube Music’s collaborative playlist
Mix makes collaboration simpler
YouTube Music means that you can collaborate with associates or household on a shared playlist. It is a useful choice, particularly for lengthy street journeys, as everybody can add their favourite tunes and artists to the combo. Nevertheless, Google’s implementation is fundamental. Every collaborator should add their favourite tracks. This makes the method tedious and time-consuming.
YouTube Music might take a lesson or two from Spotify’s Mix function, which takes the trouble out of making a customized shared playlist. If you create a Mix on Spotify and invite a good friend, it generates a shared playlist that mixes your music tastes with theirs. This takes the work out of constructing a collaborative playlist and including music tracks one after the other.
You additionally get a style match rating that exhibits how intently your listening preferences align. Plus, the Mix updates every day, serving to you and your good friend uncover new music from one another’s libraries.
Contemplating YouTube Music’s huge library, it is disappointing that Google does not leverage it to supply higher collaborative options and neighborhood integration.
Even with its drawbacks, YouTube Music takes the win
Regardless of its shortcomings, I nonetheless favor YouTube Music to Spotify and Apple Music. Google’s music streaming wins for me as a result of its huge music library and discovery algorithm. It’s among the many few issues YouTube Music does higher than Spotify and its rivals.
Nevertheless, this doesn’t give Google an excuse to not enhance YouTube Music. As a substitute, it ought to double down on its music streaming service and deal with bettering the expertise to draw extra customers. To its credit score, Google usually improves YouTube Music, simply not within the areas which are wanted. Plus, the service lags behind its rivals in a number of key areas, and Google might want to make a centered effort to bridge this hole.